Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

91206

in Glendale, CaliforniaPopulation 31,961

57.48/ 100

Ranked #6,822 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #641 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #194 of 371 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

5.0%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40.8 per million

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.2%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

49.8%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

97.9%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

13.8%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

97.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 91206, one of several in Glendale, California, on the composite measure, lands in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,822nd) and the top 37% of California (641st).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled obesity stands in the bottom 4.4% nationally, floodplain exposure is at the national minimum, and physicians rests in the top 4.7% nationally. On the other hand, modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 1.4% nationally, expected annual loss registers in the top 1.8% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 2.0% nationally. Housing-cost burden resides in the top 3.2% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water lies in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled transportation noise settles in the top 5.0% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water stands in the top 5.1% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 90041, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.0 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $89,188 predicts 79.6 years — 2.4 years above.

    Ranked #701 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 8.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 83.8 — 75 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,855 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.8 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 82.0 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #397 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.3%21.6–25.1
High blood pressure among adults31.2%29.2–33.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.6–8.9
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.3–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Depression among adults21.7%19.7–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%10.0–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%36.0–40.6
Obesity among adults24.2%21.7–26.8
Stroke among adults3.3%3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.9%7.3–10.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.4–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.9%71.5–76.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.0%71.7–76.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.4–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.0%56.6–63.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.1%64.7–69.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%71.4–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.7–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%19.8–23.9
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%30.1–35.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%18.4–21.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.8–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%12.4–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.6–15.3
Any disability among adults29.8%27.7–32.2
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Mobility disability among adults13.9%12.6–15.2
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.6–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.8%24.5–29.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.4–15.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Loneliness among adults37.9%35.2–40.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–647.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)9.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)8.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle8.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)49.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate39.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population49.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households48.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$89,188$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$1,090,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$2,199$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.0 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 82.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured