Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

89436

in Sparks, NevadaPopulation 49,544

56.81/ 100

Ranked #7,453 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #31 of 166 Nevada ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #8 of 32 Reno, NV ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

6.0%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.7%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.4%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.1%

in the top 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.9%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.8%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 89436, one of several in Sparks, Nevada places in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,453rd) and the top 19% of Nevada (31st).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled obesity sits in the bottom 9.2% nationally, and home broadband subscription lies in the top 8.2% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and energy burden resides in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 0.6% nationally, fine-particle lands in the top 0.8% nationally, and disaster risk stands in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled tree cover registers in the bottom 10.1% nationally, PFOA in drinking water settles in the top 11.3% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water sits in the top 11.6% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 89509, about 4.5 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Reno, NV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 1.8 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 85.0 — 83 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,427 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.5–27.8
High blood pressure among adults28.4%25.4–31.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.4
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Depression among adults21.2%18.2–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.9%7.7–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%33.3–40.3
Obesity among adults27.0%22.7–31.7
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%6.9–10.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.7–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.6%68.2–74.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%72.0–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%85.0–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%62.9–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.7%63.4–69.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%67.0–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%16.4–22.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%9.5–12.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.4%15.6–21.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%32.7–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%15.3–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.9–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.3–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.7–14.7
Any disability among adults27.3%24.2–30.5
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Mobility disability among adults11.2%9.8–12.6
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%21.0–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.5–12.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.9–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.9–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.9–7.5
Loneliness among adults36.3%32.6–40.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (2.1–25.8%) n=166
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (0.0–26.0%) n=161
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.0% (0.0–23.5%) n=168
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.7% (9.3–50.7%) n=168
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–10.7%) n=161
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–13.0%) n=166
Broadband subscription97.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.1–99.1%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.4% (14.3–48.2%) n=166
Homeownership rate74.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.1% (45.6–94.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–9.2%) n=166
Foreign-born population10.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.7% (0.0–27.7%) n=168
Single-parent households49.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (35.9–85.2%) n=162
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (9.9–41.6%) n=168
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.1–60.7) n=165
Median household income$114,100$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$78,357 ($48,420–$121,701) n=147
Median home value$588,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$407,300 ($143,940–$672,620) n=147
Median gross rent$2,128$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,442 ($837–$2,102) n=125
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured