ZIP code
89013
in Goldfield, NevadaPopulation 376
38.35/ 100
Ranked #27,810 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.3%)
Ranked #140 of 166 Nevada ZIPs (bottom 16%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Hearing disability
13.7%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
12.5%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
36.5 mi
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
36.4 mi
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
7.6%
in the top 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
3.6%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST72ndUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
31.3 mi
in the top 1.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST87thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.1%
in the top 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
4.4 days/year
in the bottom 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›The read
Goldfield, Nevada (ZIP 89013), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 13.3% nationally (27,810th) and the bottom 16% of Nevada (140th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The data opens plainly on what marks this place: modeled hearing disability settles in the top 1.1% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 1.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies in the top 1.1% nationally, and distance to an emergency room rests in the top 1.3% nationally. Slow internet speeds resides in the top 1.7% nationally, modeled fine-particle is in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled stroke lands in the top 3.6% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 1.1% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally.
Next to the surrounding area, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 92328, less than a tenth of a mile away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Risk Behavior
healthier than 61%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 63%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 82%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 56%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 4%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 21%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 32%
13%
Disability
healthier than 7%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.2%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 70%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 74%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 74%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 61%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 22%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 36%
14%
Disability
healthier than 8%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
92328
Californialess than 0.1 mi away
Score 51.11
Closest healthier
93513
Californiaabout 3.7 mi away
Score 49.07
Similar health profile
79854
Texas97% similar profile
Score 42.38
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 39.7% | 35.2–44.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 46.1% | 40.9–51.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 13.3% | 11.9–14.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.9% | 9.5–12.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 12.5% | 10.4–14.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 13.7% | 10.5–16.9 |
| Depression among adults | 21.3% | 17.6–25.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 17.2% | 14.3–20.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 46.9% | 41.8–52.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 35.1% | 26.5–44.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.1% | 5.0–7.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 16.8% | 13.7–20.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.6% | 9.6–16.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.3% | 78.0–84.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.3% | 74.4–82.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.8% | 85.7–89.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.8% | 58.8–70.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.7% | 54.3–62.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 68.1% | 57.7–77.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.3% | 9.9–15.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.2% | 14.1–22.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 31.2% | 24.5–37.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 32.9% | 25.9–40.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 28.9% | 23.2–34.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.6% | 14.3–19.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.4% | 16.1–22.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.7% | 13.8–19.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.5% | 36.7–50.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 13.7% | 11.6–15.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.5% | 9.3–13.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 23.9% | 19.1–28.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.3% | 5.0–7.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.9% | 6.3–9.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.2% | 18.9–27.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.0% | 13.0–21.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 16.5% | 12.5–21.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.5% | 9.2–13.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.2% | 7.5–10.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.5% | 26.8–38.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.2% | 6.8–9.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 5.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.8% (2.1–25.8%) n=166 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.6% (0.0–26.0%) n=161 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 8.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.0% (0.0–23.5%) n=168 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 17.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.7% (9.3–50.7%) n=168 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 5.5% (0.0–10.7%) n=161 |
| Households without a vehicle | 6.1% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–13.0%) n=166 |
| Broadband subscription | 93.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 92.5% (79.1–99.1%) n=166 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 28.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 31.4% (14.3–48.2%) n=166 |
| Homeownership rate | 79.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 71.1% (45.6–94.0%) n=166 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–9.2%) n=166 |
| Foreign-born population | 31.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 9.7% (0.0–27.7%) n=168 |
| Single-parent households | 49.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (35.9–85.2%) n=162 |
| Population 65+ | 19.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (9.9–41.6%) n=168 |
| Median age | 45.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.1–60.7) n=165 |
| Median household income | $78,580 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $78,357 ($48,420–$121,701) n=147 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $407,300 ($143,940–$672,620) n=147 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,442 ($837–$2,102) n=125 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured