ZIP code
89047
in Silverpeak, NevadaPopulation 222
36.88/ 100
Ranked #28,590 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.9%)
Ranked #144 of 166 Nevada ZIPs (bottom 13.3%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Industrial-pollution burden
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
63.8 mi
in the top 0.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
49.7 mi
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
49.6 mi
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Distance to a community health center
49.2 mi
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
3.6%
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST70thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
4.4 days/year
in the bottom 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›The read
Judged by its overall standing, Silverpeak, Nevada (ZIP 89047) sits in the bottom 10.9% nationally (28,590th) and the bottom 13.3% of Nevada (144th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
A few readings carry most of this area's story: distance to a nursing home settles in the top 0.7% nationally, distance to an emergency room lands in the top 0.8% nationally, and distance to a community health center rests in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled fine-particle settles in the top 1.9% nationally. On the better side, modeled industrial-pollution burden lands at the national minimum, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and transportation noise lands at the national minimum. Poverty rests at the national minimum, and modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally.
Placed beside its immediate neighbors, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 89010, about 16 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 82%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 55%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 30%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 15%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 11%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 12%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 14%
8%
Disability
healthier than 14%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.03%
5%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 61%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 25%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 19%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 36%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 34%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 14%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 6%
8%
Disability
healthier than 21%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.6%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
89010
Nevadaabout 16 mi away
Score 39.79
Closest healthier
89013
Nevadaabout 17 mi away
Score 38.35
Similar health profile
89832
Nevada97% similar profile
Score 29.67
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 31.8% | 27.5–36.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 37.3% | 32.3–42.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.6% | 7.6–9.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.2% | 10.6–14.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.9% | 6.5–9.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.3% | 8.6–14.6 |
| Depression among adults | 24.8% | 20.8–29.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.7% | 11.2–16.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.3% | 35.3–45.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.1% | 29.2–47.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.4% | 3.6–5.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 12.0% | 9.5–14.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 11.5% | 8.2–15.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 73.1% | 68.9–76.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 72.5% | 67.7–77.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 84.0% | 80.7–87.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 61.6% | 55.4–67.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 55.3% | 50.7–59.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 67.8% | 57.6–76.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.3% | 13.2–19.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 22.7% | 17.4–29.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 29.0% | 22.7–37.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.8% | 30.2–45.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 27.7% | 22.1–34.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.6% | 17.6–24.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.1% | 15.8–23.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.4% | 15.7–23.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.4% | 33.0–47.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.9% | 7.5–10.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.6% | 9.3–14.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.8% | 15.7–24.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.1% | 4.7–7.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.3% | 5.8–9.0 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.4% | 20.6–30.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 20.9% | 15.7–26.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 20.9% | 15.3–27.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.7% | 12.4–19.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.4% | 9.2–14.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.6% | 28.6–40.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 11.5% | 9.3–13.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.8% (2.1–25.8%) n=166 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.6% (0.0–26.0%) n=161 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.0% (0.0–23.5%) n=168 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 14.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.7% (9.3–50.7%) n=168 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 5.5% (0.0–10.7%) n=161 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–13.0%) n=166 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 92.5% (79.1–99.1%) n=166 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 41.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 31.4% (14.3–48.2%) n=166 |
| Homeownership rate | 64.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 71.1% (45.6–94.0%) n=166 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–9.2%) n=166 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 9.7% (0.0–27.7%) n=168 |
| Single-parent households | 22.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (35.9–85.2%) n=162 |
| Population 65+ | 14.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (9.9–41.6%) n=168 |
| Median age | 33.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.1–60.7) n=165 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $78,357 ($48,420–$121,701) n=147 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $407,300 ($143,940–$672,620) n=147 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,442 ($837–$2,102) n=125 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured