Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

88416

in Conchas Dam, New MexicoPopulation 282

38.98/ 100

Ranked #27,407 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.6%)

Ranked #261 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

14.8%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

15.3%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.1%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

49.6 mi

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21.4%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.1%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.4%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Conchas Dam, New Mexico (ZIP 88416), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 14.6% nationally (27,407th) and the bottom 23% of New Mexico (261st).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 0.2% nationally, and hearing disability lands in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled stroke stands in the top 1.1% nationally, and distance to a nursing home registers in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled diabetes settles in the top 2.2% nationally, mobility disability sits in the top 2.4% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 4.4% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled binge drinking rests in the bottom 1.4% nationally, housing-cost burden resides at the national minimum, and modeled transportation noise is at the national minimum.

For anyone unfamiliar, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 87746, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.05%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults41.1%36.7–45.4
High blood pressure among adults50.2%45.3–55.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.8%11.4–14.2
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.6–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults14.8%12.7–16.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.7%11.1–16.4
Depression among adults21.8%18.4–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.4%18.3–24.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.2%40.2–50.2
Obesity among adults37.7%30.2–45.6
Stroke among adults7.1%6.1–8.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.6%17.1–24.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.1%11.3–17.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.9%79.6–85.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.5%72.6–80.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.3–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.5%58.0–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.4%57.6–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.7%59.6–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.1%8.1–12.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%14.1–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.5%27.4–39.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%27.5–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.9%26.8–37.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.6–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults20.8%17.9–23.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%13.4–18.5
Any disability among adults45.1%39.3–50.9
Hearing disability among adults15.3%13.3–17.4
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.0–13.9
Mobility disability among adults26.0%21.8–30.3
Self-care disability among adults7.4%6.2–8.6
Vision disability among adults9.4%8.0–10.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%19.3–27.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.7%16.0–24.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.9%15.2–23.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.3–14.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.1–11.3
Loneliness among adults31.4%26.3–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.9–11.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6491.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)2.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription81.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+74.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age76.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.6 yr ± 3.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.93 years of 85.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured