Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

87752

in Wagon Mound, New MexicoPopulation 642

51.03/ 100

Ranked #14,816 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #113 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

0 days/year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

7.3%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

44.5 mi

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST19th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.9%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.9%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

19.7 mi

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST59th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.1%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Wagon Mound, New Mexico (ZIP 87752) sits in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,816th) and the top 34% of New Mexico (113th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled humid heat rests at the national minimum, air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and binge drinking lands in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Physicians rests in the top 4.4% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 5.0% nationally. Against that, modeled energy burden lands in the top 1.0% nationally, and distance to an emergency room rests in the top 1.0% nationally. Walkability settles in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and modeled diabetes lands in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled uninsured rests in the top 6.4% nationally.

Put plainly, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 87747, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.8%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.8%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%26.2–34.0
High blood pressure among adults41.7%37.0–46.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Current asthma among adults8.4%7.3–9.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.5–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Depression among adults17.8%14.8–21.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.9%16.1–21.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%35.6–45.2
Obesity among adults33.6%25.8–42.3
Stroke among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.5–17.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.1%14.4–22.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%77.3–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.5%70.3–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.4–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.1%55.4–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.1%54.2–62.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.2%61.5–78.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.9%8.7–13.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%8.8–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%25.0–36.4
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%26.7–40.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.4%23.4–31.8
Frequent mental distress among adults12.6%10.8–14.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%14.4–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.3–15.5
Any disability among adults37.1%31.8–42.7
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.6–12.6
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.6–10.3
Mobility disability among adults19.9%17.0–23.3
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.0–6.7
Vision disability among adults9.1%7.9–10.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%18.9–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%16.8–24.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.9%12.7–19.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.5%12.8–18.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.3–11.5
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.0–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.6–12.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–642.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription70.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate67.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households45.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+34.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age62.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$43,912$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$157,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$771$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 1.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured