Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83874

in Murray, IdahoPopulation 76

43.34/ 100

Ranked #24,073 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #237 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 11.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

18.9%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

14.5%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

24.7%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

62%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Park land

86.2%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.5%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.58 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

4.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

50%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

88.5%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Murray, Idaho (ZIP 83874) lands in the bottom 25% nationally (24,073rd) and the bottom 11.6% of Idaho (237th).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled hearing disability settles in the top 0.06% nationally, coronary heart disease is in the top 0.3% nationally, and mammography sits in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the top 2.3% nationally, walkability lies in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and modeled fine-particle stands in the top 1.3% nationally. Home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 1.5% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and park land resides in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled tree cover settles in the top 1.8% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. On the overall standing, ZIP 59873, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults44.0%39.4–48.7
High blood pressure among adults50.5%45.4–55.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.9%12.3–15.8
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.6–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults14.5%12.2–17.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.0%10.0–16.8
Depression among adults18.2%15.3–21.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.0%15.8–22.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.5%42.7–52.5
Obesity among adults37.0%30.4–44.2
Stroke among adults6.5%5.3–7.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.8%18.3–27.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%6.0–12.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%76.9–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%77.9–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%86.6–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.2%59.4–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.4%55.2–63.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years62.0%51.7–71.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.9%8.9–13.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%12.9–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.9%23.7–36.8
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%27.3–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.8%20.5–32.4
Frequent mental distress among adults13.1%11.3–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults19.1%15.9–22.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%12.3–18.4
Any disability among adults46.5%39.7–53.5
Hearing disability among adults18.9%16.2–21.7
Independent living disability among adults9.8%7.9–12.2
Mobility disability among adults25.1%20.3–30.8
Self-care disability among adults6.1%4.8–7.8
Vision disability among adults6.9%5.5–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%16.9–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%9.4–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%7.2–13.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.8–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.5–8.6
Loneliness among adults24.7%20.3–29.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.2–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6442.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle25.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription50.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population7.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households70.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+63.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age69.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$42,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 1.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.74 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured