Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

88030

in Deming, New MexicoPopulation 24,413

36.29/ 100

Ranked #28,861 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.0%)

Ranked #285 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

25%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.0%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.9%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

53.8%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST24th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.1%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST34th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

22.2 mi

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST66th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

32.7%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.4%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Deming, New Mexico (ZIP 88030) ranks in the bottom 10.0% nationally (28,861st) and the bottom 15% of New Mexico (285th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled uninsured registers in the top 2.3% nationally, and vision disability sits in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the top 3.0% nationally, and fair or poor health is in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 4.0% nationally, mammography settles in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled food insecurity resides in the top 4.5% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 6.0% nationally. On the encouraging side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 3.9% nationally.

In plainer terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 88007, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.2 ± 1.3 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.1 years — 4.0 years below them.

    Ranked #3,007 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.4 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 21.4 — 74 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #820 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.6–33.2
High blood pressure among adults40.3%36.1–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%7.0–8.4
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.6%9.6–11.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Depression among adults23.1%19.6–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.3%16.1–20.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%34.7–43.6
Obesity among adults36.1%28.8–44.0
Stroke among adults5.6%5.2–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.7%17.9–25.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years25.0%21.9–28.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%74.1–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.4%65.0–73.5
Cholesterol screening among adults80.7%78.4–82.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.8%47.6–59.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.3%45.0–53.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.1%56.2–74.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%9.6–14.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.4–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.0%31.1–41.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%29.2–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.2%30.7–37.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.7–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults20.3%18.2–22.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%18.0–22.4
Any disability among adults43.4%38.7–48.2
Hearing disability among adults11.7%10.4–12.9
Independent living disability among adults13.4%12.1–14.8
Mobility disability among adults23.4%20.9–26.1
Self-care disability among adults7.9%7.3–8.6
Vision disability among adults12.0%11.0–13.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.8%22.9–30.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.7%29.0–36.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.4%26.8–33.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.0%20.1–25.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.8%14.0–17.6
Loneliness among adults35.7%30.3–41.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.1–18.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6416.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)23.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription80.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate71.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population15.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households47.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+20.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$37,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$130,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$659$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured