ZIP code
88030
in Deming, New MexicoPopulation 24,413
36.29/ 100
Ranked #28,861 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.0%)
Ranked #285 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 15%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Uninsured (under 65)
25%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
12.0%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
7.9%
in the top 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
34.2%
in the top 3.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
53.8%
in the bottom 4.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST24thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Mammography
66.1%
in the bottom 4.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST34thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
22.2 mi
in the top 3.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST66thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
13.4%
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
32.7%
in the top 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
23.4%
in the top 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST83rdUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, Deming, New Mexico (ZIP 88030) ranks in the bottom 10.0% nationally (28,861st) and the bottom 15% of New Mexico (285th).
Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled uninsured registers in the top 2.3% nationally, and vision disability sits in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the top 3.0% nationally, and fair or poor health is in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 4.0% nationally, mammography settles in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled food insecurity resides in the top 4.5% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 6.0% nationally. On the encouraging side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 3.9% nationally.
In plainer terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 88007, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 41%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 21%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 7%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 40%
11%
Disability
healthier than 3%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 34%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 60%
14%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 26%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 25%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 22%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 23%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 29%
8%
Disability
healthier than 15%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 12%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below its nearby ZIPs
The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors
Estimated life expectancy is 77.2 ± 1.3 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.1 years — 4.0 years below them.
Ranked #3,007 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 95.4 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 21.4 — 74 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #820 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
87937
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 35.50
Closest healthier
88007
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 51.61
Similar health profile
81067
Colorado98% similar profile
Score 32.91
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.8% | 26.6–33.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 40.3% | 36.1–44.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.7% | 7.0–8.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.1% | 8.9–11.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.6% | 9.6–11.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.3% | 9.2–11.5 |
| Depression among adults | 23.1% | 19.6–27.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 18.3% | 16.1–20.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.1% | 34.7–43.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.1% | 28.8–44.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.6% | 5.2–6.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 21.7% | 17.9–25.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 25.0% | 21.9–28.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.1% | 74.1–79.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 69.4% | 65.0–73.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 80.7% | 78.4–82.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 53.8% | 47.6–59.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 49.3% | 45.0–53.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 66.1% | 56.2–74.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.9% | 9.6–14.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.7% | 15.4–20.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 36.0% | 31.1–41.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.2% | 29.2–43.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 34.2% | 30.7–37.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.8% | 15.7–19.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 20.3% | 18.2–22.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 20.1% | 18.0–22.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.4% | 38.7–48.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.7% | 10.4–12.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.4% | 12.1–14.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 23.4% | 20.9–26.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.9% | 7.3–8.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 12.0% | 11.0–13.0 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 26.8% | 22.9–30.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 32.7% | 29.0–36.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 30.4% | 26.8–33.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 23.0% | 20.1–25.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 15.8% | 14.0–17.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.7% | 30.3–41.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 16.2% | 14.1–18.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 28.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 16.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 12.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 23.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 14.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 5.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347 |
| Broadband subscription | 80.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 83.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 24.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 18.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347 |
| Homeownership rate | 71.7% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347 |
| Foreign-born population | 15.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352 |
| Single-parent households | 47.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339 |
| Population 65+ | 20.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352 |
| Median age | 35.9 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339 |
| Median household income | $37,417 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265 |
| Median home value | $130,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255 |
| Median gross rent | $659 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $917 ($549–$1,408) n=173 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.2 yr ± 0.64 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured