Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

88072

in Vado, New MexicoPopulation 2,608

31.11/ 100

Ranked #30,520 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.9%)

Ranked #301 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 10.7%)

Ranked #22 of 23 Las Cruces, NM ZIPs (bottom 4.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

36.2%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

16.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

10.1%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

43.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

44.3%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

60.4%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

48.7%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

16%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

24.7%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

34.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Vado, New Mexico (ZIP 88072) sits in the bottom 4.9% nationally (30,520th) and the bottom 10.7% of New Mexico (301st).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled uninsured lands in the top 0.5% nationally, vision disability resides in the top 0.2% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 0.2% nationally, colon screening stands in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and mammography is in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled food insecurity rests in the top 0.3% nationally, and independent living disability sits in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 1.2% nationally, and housing insecurity lands in the top 0.5% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 88011, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Las Cruces, NM metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.9%23.1–28.9
High blood pressure among adults38.1%34.5–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.4
Depression among adults23.0%19.7–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.1%18.6–23.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%32.6–40.2
Obesity among adults44.2%38.3–50.3
Stroke among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.5%19.5–27.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years36.2%30.4–42.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.9%69.6–75.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.8%63.6–71.9
Cholesterol screening among adults76.0%72.8–79.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years44.3%39.4–49.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.2%43.6–50.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years60.4%52.2–68.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.0–14.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.7%16.7–23.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults44.0%38.6–49.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%30.7–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults43.5%38.8–48.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%16.7–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults23.1%20.3–26.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults24.7%21.4–28.2
Any disability among adults49.5%44.3–55.0
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Independent living disability among adults16.0%13.9–18.3
Mobility disability among adults25.9%22.7–29.3
Self-care disability among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
Vision disability among adults16.4%14.6–18.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.1%25.9–34.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults48.7%43.2–54.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults45.0%39.5–50.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.5%30.2–38.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults22.8%19.8–25.8
Loneliness among adults38.2%33.3–43.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults23.4%20.4–26.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6428.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)42.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate77.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population31.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households32.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+11.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age27.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$53,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$99,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$764$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 1.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.66 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured