Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

87072

in Cochiti Pueblo, New MexicoPopulation 789

40.29/ 100

Ranked #26,549 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #250 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #43 of 51 Albuquerque, NM ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

25.7 mi

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST72nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.2%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST35th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST30th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.9%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST29th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.1%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

17.9 mi

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

16.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Cochiti Pueblo, New Mexico (ZIP 87072) lands in the bottom 17% nationally (26,549th) and the bottom 26% of New Mexico (250th).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled mammography lands in the bottom 4.2% nationally, colon screening lies in the bottom 4.8% nationally, and short sleep stands in the top 4.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests in the top 4.1% nationally, and modeled transportation registers in the top 4.7% nationally. On the better side, childcare resides in the top 0.7% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 2.8% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss lands in the bottom 4.5% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, childcare runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. On the overall standing, ZIP 87041, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Albuquerque, NM metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.5%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%23.7–30.1
High blood pressure among adults36.2%32.2–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Current asthma among adults13.7%12.0–15.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.2–8.5
Depression among adults26.9%22.9–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.1–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.2%28.2–36.2
Obesity among adults38.1%31.2–45.0
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.1%17.2–25.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%6.9–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.1%68.5–75.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.0%64.5–73.3
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%79.4–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.9%49.4–59.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.7%48.2–56.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.2%57.1–73.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%11.5–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.8%17.2–24.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%20.7–30.0
Short sleep duration among adults44.1%37.7–49.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.7%22.0–29.5
Frequent mental distress among adults21.4%18.6–24.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.9%15.6–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%15.7–21.1
Any disability among adults39.9%34.7–45.1
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Independent living disability among adults11.4%9.8–13.2
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.3–20.6
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.1%25.6–34.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.2%23.3–33.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.2%17.7–26.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.0%17.4–24.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.3%13.8–18.8
Loneliness among adults37.2%31.9–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.5–18.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6451.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle14.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription82.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate91.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households32.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+23.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age47.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$83,472$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$248,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured