Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

89820

in Battle Mountain, NevadaPopulation 5,562

43.56/ 100

Ranked #23,845 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #106 of 166 Nevada ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

40.8%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.79 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

109.4 mi

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST46th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.3%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

11.7 days/year

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

9.8%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

13.8%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Battle Mountain, Nevada (ZIP 89820) sits in the bottom 26% nationally (23,845th) and the bottom 36% of Nevada (106th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled arsenic lands in the top 1.5% nationally, walkability resides in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and crowded housing lies in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled fine-particle settles in the top 7.6% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Better still, modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 3.1% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Grocery registers in the top 7.9% nationally, and modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 8.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, slow internet speeds runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 89445, about 0.3 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.3%24.7–32.0
High blood pressure among adults35.6%31.1–40.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.1–8.7
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.0–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.1–10.4
Depression among adults23.7%19.9–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.4–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%32.9–42.4
Obesity among adults36.3%28.0–45.2
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%12.5–18.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.8%11.7–16.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.3%68.5–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.4%66.6–75.7
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%80.6–84.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.7%53.7–65.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.0%51.5–60.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.4%61.0–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%13.7–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.0%16.3–22.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%24.0–34.3
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%30.9–45.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.3%22.3–28.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.7–22.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%15.1–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%16.3–20.8
Any disability among adults37.4%32.6–42.7
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.8–9.8
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.2–11.6
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.2–19.6
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.3–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.9%21.8–30.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%17.5–23.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.2%16.3–22.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%13.9–18.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.8–12.8
Loneliness among adults35.6%30.0–41.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.6–12.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (2.1–25.8%) n=166
Uninsured 18–646.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (0.0–26.0%) n=161
No HS diploma (25+)12.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.0% (0.0–23.5%) n=168
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.7% (9.3–50.7%) n=168
Unemployment rate (16+)9.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–10.7%) n=161
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–13.0%) n=166
Broadband subscription95.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.1–99.1%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.4% (14.3–48.2%) n=166
Homeownership rate77.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.1% (45.6–94.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–9.2%) n=166
Foreign-born population3.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.7% (0.0–27.7%) n=168
Single-parent households62.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (35.9–85.2%) n=162
Population 65+14.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (9.9–41.6%) n=168
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.1–60.7) n=165
Median household income$89,014$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$78,357 ($48,420–$121,701) n=147
Median home value$222,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$407,300 ($143,940–$672,620) n=147
Median gross rent$886$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,442 ($837–$2,102) n=125
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.4–82.3) n=151

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured