ZIP code
87023
in Jarales, New MexicoPopulation 306
48.31/ 100
Ranked #18,545 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)
Ranked #150 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (top 45%)
Ranked #26 of 51 Albuquerque, NM ZIPs (bottom 49%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Floodplain exposure
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
48.1%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
32.1 mi
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST83rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
54.6%
in the bottom 4.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST28thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
72.4%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Uninsured (under 65)
17.6%
in the top 6.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST68thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
71.6%
in the bottom 7.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST27thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
14.1 mi
in the top 8.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST47thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Jarales, New Mexico (ZIP 87023) lands in the bottom 42% nationally (18,545th) and the top 45% of New Mexico (150th).
Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: floodplain exposure registers at the national maximum, and modeled arsenic rests in the top 0.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Modeled pfas lands in the top 3.8% nationally, tree cover sits at the national minimum, and uninsured is in the top 6.9% nationally. Home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 7.1% nationally. On the better side, modeled transportation noise resides at the national minimum. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs.
Set beside the nearby areas, floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 87042, about 14 miles away, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Albuquerque, NM metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 62%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 74%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 87%
8%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 60%
14%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 20%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 8%
13%
Disability
healthier than 38%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 4%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 30%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 66%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 85%
8%
Disability
healthier than 75%
7%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 44%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 47%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 50%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 52%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 25%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
Lifting this score
Mental Health
healthier than 93%
8%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 47%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 58%
14%
Disability
healthier than 49%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 33%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 37%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 40%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 37%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
87002
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 45.06
Closest healthier
87042
New Mexicoabout 14 mi away
Score 52.68
Similar health profile
67841
Kansas97% similar profile
Score 49.93
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 26.9% | 23.6–30.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 36.6% | 32.3–41.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.4% | 6.6–8.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.0% | 7.8–10.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.3% | 6.4–8.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.9% | 5.0–6.9 |
| Depression among adults | 19.8% | 16.6–23.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.3% | 13.1–17.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 37.8% | 33.2–42.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 35.1% | 28.1–42.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.8% | 3.4–4.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 17.0% | 13.9–20.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 17.6% | 14.1–21.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 76.4% | 72.9–79.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 71.1% | 66.7–75.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.8% | 84.8–88.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 54.6% | 48.9–60.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 52.3% | 48.3–56.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 70.1% | 62.0–77.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.8% | 10.4–15.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 11.9% | 9.8–14.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 28.5% | 23.5–33.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.0% | 30.1–42.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.8% | 21.2–28.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.1% | 12.2–16.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.0% | 13.8–18.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.1% | 12.1–16.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 34.6% | 29.6–39.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.6% | 7.6–9.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.1% | 7.0–9.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 16.7% | 14.2–19.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.7% | 4.1–5.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.1% | 6.3–8.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.8% | 21.3–30.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.5% | 15.6–23.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 13.6% | 10.8–16.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.2% | 13.3–19.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.3% | 7.8–10.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.1% | 26.9–39.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.9% | 8.2–11.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 12.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 12.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 5.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 18.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347 |
| Broadband subscription | 71.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 83.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 25.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 18.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347 |
| Homeownership rate | 85.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352 |
| Single-parent households | 61.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339 |
| Population 65+ | 26.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352 |
| Median age | 51.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265 |
| Median home value | $169,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $917 ($549–$1,408) n=173 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.2 yr ± 1.77 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.77 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured