Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

87031

in Los Lunas, New MexicoPopulation 47,514

47.77/ 100

Ranked #19,221 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #156 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #28 of 51 Albuquerque, NM ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

55.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.4%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

67.6%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.2%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST43rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

258 units

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

19.3%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

13.2%

in the top 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US71st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Los Lunas, New Mexico (ZIP 87031) lands in the bottom 40% nationally (19,221st) and the top 46% of New Mexico (156th).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled arsenic is in the top 0.5% nationally, uninsured sits in the top 5.0% nationally, and pfas lands in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the top 7.3% nationally, colon screening stands in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and housing insecurity rests in the top 10.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers in the top 11.0% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 9.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center is at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. On the overall standing, ZIP 87042, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Albuquerque, NM metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%21.5–27.6
High blood pressure among adults33.8%29.8–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.5%5.8–7.1
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Depression among adults22.2%18.7–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.1–16.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%30.6–39.2
Obesity among adults35.7%28.5–43.4
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%11.9–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.4%17.0–21.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.2%69.7–76.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.1%63.5–72.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%80.1–84.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.2%52.0–62.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.8%53.0–60.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.8%61.7–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.2–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%11.9–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%24.3–33.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%29.5–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.3%23.3–29.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.4–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.9–18.8
Any disability among adults35.8%31.4–40.4
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.2–18.3
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.6
Vision disability among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.3%22.0–30.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.3%21.1–27.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.4%16.9–22.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.3%16.7–22.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
Loneliness among adults35.1%29.1–41.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.9–14.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6410.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)14.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)7.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription86.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate83.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population9.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households45.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+17.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age38.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$60,902$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$229,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$1,062$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured