Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85302

in Glendale, ArizonaPopulation 40,612

48.27/ 100

Ranked #18,590 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #230 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #118 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

99.5%

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

134.3 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.8%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

160 intersections/sq mi

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.1%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST31st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

60 µg/L

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.50%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.4%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 85302, one of several in Glendale, Arizona lands in the bottom 42% nationally (18,590th) and the bottom 42% of Arizona (230th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 0.09% nationally, and modeled extreme heat stands in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 4.2% nationally, and tree cover lands at the national minimum. Modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 6.1% nationally, lithium in drinking water is in the top 8.8% nationally, and modeled uninsured settles in the top 8.4% nationally. Homeownership resides in the bottom 10.6% nationally. More encouragingly, walkability registers in the top 4.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure rests in the bottom 9.7% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 85304, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.3%22.6–26.1
High blood pressure among adults32.2%30.0–34.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%7.1–8.2
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.7–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.7–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Depression among adults19.7%17.7–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.9–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%34.4–39.0
Obesity among adults32.8%29.2–36.4
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.5%15.1–20.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.4%14.6–18.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.3%70.1–74.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.3%69.8–74.8
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%81.2–84.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.1%52.9–59.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.5%50.8–56.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%67.7–77.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.7–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%12.0–14.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%22.1–27.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%34.2–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%20.4–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.3–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.4–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.4%14.9–17.9
Any disability among adults33.7%31.1–36.2
Hearing disability among adults7.7%7.1–8.5
Independent living disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.8–16.4
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.6%6.1–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.7%25.5–30.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.3%19.4–23.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.1%14.4–17.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.8–16.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%10.1–12.3
Loneliness among adults34.3%31.7–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6419.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)14.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle9.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate52.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population15.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households41.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$65,132$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$364,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,332$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured