Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

86435

in Supai, ArizonaPopulation 0

41.93/ 100

Ranked #25,264 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #293 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #13 of 22 Flagstaff, AZ ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

2.3%

in the bottom 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

48.6%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST17th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.2%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST22nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

46.2 mi

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

48 mi

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.38 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

39.6 mi

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

5.9%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

4 days/year

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Supai, Arizona (ZIP 86435) lands in the bottom 21% nationally (25,264th) and the bottom 26% of Arizona (293rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that define the ground here come first: modeled colon screening rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and mammography is in the bottom 1.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands in the top 0.8% nationally, and distance to an emergency room settles in the top 0.8% nationally. Walkability lies in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and slow internet speeds resides in the top 2.2% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled pfas lands in the bottom 0.09% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled transportation noise sits at the national minimum. Modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 2.4% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 86023, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Flagstaff, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.02%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOHPartial

healthier than 1%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.5%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOHPartial

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOHPartial

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.5%20.4–24.9
High blood pressure among adults30.3%27.7–33.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Current asthma among adults13.8%12.3–15.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.6–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.0–8.5
Depression among adults22.5%19.8–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%11.0–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.0%28.3–33.8
Obesity among adults28.1%24.1–32.7
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.7%10.3–15.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%8.2–14.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.3%64.2–70.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.2%64.6–71.7
Cholesterol screening among adults79.4%75.9–82.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years48.6%44.3–52.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.2%48.9–55.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.2%55.9–69.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.6–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%14.0–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.4%15.9–23.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%34.3–43.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.3%20.5–28.2
Frequent mental distress among adults21.5%18.9–24.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%13.7–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%16.4–22.7
Any disability among adults36.7%32.1–41.4
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.2–12.9
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.4–16.9
Self-care disability among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Vision disability among adults8.2%7.0–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.8%28.6–37.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.6%21.3–32.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.2%14.9–23.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.9%16.2–23.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.6%13.8–19.6
Loneliness among adults36.0%32.1–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.6–16.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 1.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.93 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured