ZIP code
85927
in Greer, ArizonaPopulation 315
54.08/ 100
Ranked #10,593 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)
Ranked #142 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (top 36%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Humid extreme heat
0.3 days/year
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›Park land
89.5%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
8.7%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
28 mi
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
53.8%
in the bottom 2.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST9thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
26.6%
in the bottom 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
10 per million
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Mammography
65.8%
in the bottom 3.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST34thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Greer, Arizona (ZIP 85927) comes out in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,593rd) and the top 36% of Arizona (142nd).
The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 0.3% nationally, park land lands in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled binge drinking is in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Housing-cost burden resides at the national minimum, modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and poverty lies at the national minimum. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally. By contrast, distance to a nursing home settles in the top 1.8% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the bottom 3.7% nationally.
Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 85925, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 73%
16%
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.08%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 64%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 97%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 92%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 97%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 10%
21%
Disability
healthier than 22%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 8%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 67%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 98%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 84%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 90%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 79%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 92%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 22%
21%
Disability
healthier than 33%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 18%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85925
Arizonashares a border
Score 55.66
Closest healthier
85938
Arizonashares a border
Score 55.99
Similar health profile
88338
New Mexico97% similar profile
Score 51.10
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 37.4% | 34.2–41.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.9% | 38.4–45.5 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 14.5% | 13.1–16.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.5% | 10.3–12.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–12.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.7% | 9.7–14.0 |
| Depression among adults | 18.4% | 16.0–21.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 16.1% | 14.1–18.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.4% | 39.9–47.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 29.9% | 25.7–34.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.7% | 4.9–6.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.5% | 12.0–17.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.9% | 6.1–10.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 84.8% | 82.1–87.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.3% | 78.7–83.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.6% | 90.2–92.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.3% | 60.9–69.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 63.8% | 60.4–67.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 65.8% | 58.6–72.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 8.7% | 7.3–10.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 11.9% | 9.5–14.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.2% | 19.4–27.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 31.5% | 27.2–36.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 22.7% | 19.3–26.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.7% | 11.9–15.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.1% | 14.9–19.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.7% | 10.8–14.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 35.9% | 31.5–40.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.2% | 10.8–13.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.1% | 7.7–10.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.6% | 16.6–22.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.6% | 4.7–6.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.9–8.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.1% | 20.8–27.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.6% | 10.1–15.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.7% | 8.3–13.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.9% | 7.4–10.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.9% | 5.8–8.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 26.6% | 23.3–30.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.7% | 5.6–7.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 63.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 53.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 53.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 78.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 69.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | $92,026 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | $558,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.8 yr ± 1.89 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.89 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured