Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

81128

in Chromo, ColoradoPopulation 34

55.94/ 100

Ranked #8,342 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #239 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$250,001

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

37.3 mi

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

2.5 days/year

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

7.7%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.75 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

19.7 mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Chromo, Colorado (ZIP 81128) lands in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,342nd) and the top 48% of Colorado (239th).

continue reading

This area's defining measures are easy to pick out: slow internet speeds rests in the top 1.7% nationally, walkability registers in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and distance to a nursing home resides in the top 3.4% nationally. On the brighter side, household income settles at the national maximum, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 1.3% nationally, and modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Housing-cost burden lands at the national minimum, and poverty lies at the national minimum. Home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. On the overall standing, ZIP 81147, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.2%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.3%32.2–40.4
High blood pressure among adults39.9%35.0–44.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.3%11.9–14.7
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.1–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%7.5–11.7
Depression among adults20.4%17.1–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%11.6–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.5%36.7–46.5
Obesity among adults28.0%21.0–36.0
Stroke among adults4.7%4.1–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%10.6–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%7.2–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%76.7–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%73.0–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.2–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%63.1–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.3%60.4–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.9%62.2–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.4–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%9.4–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.5%16.7–26.9
Short sleep duration among adults27.7%21.9–34.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%16.3–24.3
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%11.8–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.1–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.2–15.8
Any disability among adults33.8%28.5–39.7
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.0–12.1
Independent living disability among adults8.2%6.6–9.9
Mobility disability among adults17.1%13.9–20.6
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.7–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.7%4.8–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)100.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate68.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+64.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age65.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$250,001$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 1.3778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.8–83.2) n=466

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.37 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured