Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85128

in Coolidge, ArizonaPopulation 19,487

38.66/ 100

Ranked #27,627 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.9%)

Ranked #318 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #147 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (bottom 7.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

220 µg/L

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

132 days/year

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

43.8%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.2%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST32nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.1%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17.5%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.1%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST34th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Coolidge, Arizona (ZIP 85128), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 13.9% nationally (27,627th) and the bottom 19% of Arizona (318th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: lithium in drinking water sits in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled extreme heat settles in the top 0.5% nationally, and modeled arsenic registers in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the bottom 3.1% nationally, modeled tree cover lands at the national minimum, and unemployment is in the top 5.2% nationally. Crowded housing resides in the top 6.0% nationally, and modeled short sleep rests in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled uninsured lies in the top 7.0% nationally, and colon screening sits in the bottom 7.6% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 85132, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 79.0; chronic-disease standing 28.4 — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,443 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.1%25.7–30.5
High blood pressure among adults37.4%34.4–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.3
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Depression among adults21.5%18.9–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%13.9–17.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%36.6–42.7
Obesity among adults43.0%38.2–47.9
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.6%17.4–24.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.5%15.3–19.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.6%72.0–77.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.3%71.1–77.3
Cholesterol screening among adults81.4%79.4–83.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.1%52.8–61.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.9%44.8–51.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.2%58.4–71.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%12.1–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%14.6–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.7%28.0–35.1
Short sleep duration among adults43.0%38.8–47.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.5%25.7–31.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.1–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.9–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.7%17.6–21.7
Any disability among adults39.3%35.7–42.7
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Independent living disability among adults11.2%10.0–12.3
Mobility disability among adults19.0%17.1–20.9
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Vision disability among adults8.6%7.8–9.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.1%25.0–31.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.8%24.9–30.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.2%18.8–23.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.9–21.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.8%12.4–15.3
Loneliness among adults35.1%31.6–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.7%12.1–15.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6415.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)14.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)13.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle10.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription91.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate74.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population8.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households51.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+13.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age32.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$65,477$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$249,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,304$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured