Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85043

in Phoenix, ArizonaPopulation 41,331

46.29/ 100

Ranked #21,001 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #255 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #130 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

26%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

48.3%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

135.9 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

93.7%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

10.3%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.5%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

26.6%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.2%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 85043, one of several in Phoenix, Arizona comes out in the bottom 35% nationally (21,001st) and the bottom 35% of Arizona (255th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled uninsured resides in the top 2.0% nationally, colon screening rests in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and extreme heat lies in the top 0.3% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 0.3% nationally, crowded housing settles in the top 4.4% nationally, and modeled tree cover registers at the national minimum. Modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 5.4% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled high blood pressure lands in the bottom 4.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease is in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Transit resides in the top 6.1% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 85339, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 3.2 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 92.0 (top 10%) — 89 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,802 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.1%15.7–18.5
High blood pressure among adults26.6%24.7–28.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Current asthma among adults10.0%9.0–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Depression among adults17.8%16.0–19.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%10.2–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.0%29.8–34.3
Obesity among adults35.1%31.4–38.9
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%13.5–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years26.0%23.4–28.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure64.5%61.8–67.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.9%65.0–70.6
Cholesterol screening among adults79.5%77.4–81.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years48.3%45.0–51.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.7%46.0–51.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%68.0–77.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%14.5–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%11.4–14.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.8%25.2–30.8
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%36.2–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.8%22.9–27.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.7–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%12.2–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%16.5–19.9
Any disability among adults33.2%30.8–36.1
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.2
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.9–9.5
Mobility disability among adults13.1%12.0–14.4
Self-care disability among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
Vision disability among adults7.6%7.1–8.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.5%29.0–34.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.4%26.9–31.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.8%17.7–21.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.0%20.0–24.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.8–15.6
Loneliness among adults37.0%34.3–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6427.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)24.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription90.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate65.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population25.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households32.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+6.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age30.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$78,257$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$343,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,697$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured