Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84662

in Spring City, UtahPopulation 1,460

50.04/ 100

Ranked #16,196 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #227 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

8.9%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

3 days/year

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

20.8 mi

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

32.3 mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

76.6 mi

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST64th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.5%

in the top 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

4.8%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

Spring City, Utah (ZIP 84662), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 49% nationally (16,196th) and the bottom 20% of Utah (227th).

continue reading

The measures that matter most for this area lead the way: distance to a nursing home sits in the top 3.1% nationally, and distance to a community health center lies in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the top 6.5% nationally. On the better side, modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 0.4% nationally, outpatient is in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 5.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle settles at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Next to the surrounding area, outpatient runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 84623, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 97.3 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 24.8 — 73 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #921 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.4%31.9–39.0
High blood pressure among adults37.9%34.0–42.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.6–13.0
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.0–11.1
Depression among adults25.2%21.9–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%12.6–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%34.2–42.4
Obesity among adults30.1%24.6–36.2
Stroke among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.7%15.4–22.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%7.9–12.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%73.9–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.1%72.6–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.0%82.0–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%61.4–71.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.7%64.1–71.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.7%61.3–77.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.9%7.3–10.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.5%9.3–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%18.8–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%28.8–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.1%17.7–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.0–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.2–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%13.7–18.3
Any disability among adults36.8%32.1–41.6
Hearing disability among adults11.5%10.1–12.9
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.1–10.9
Mobility disability among adults18.0%15.3–20.7
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.5%15.6–21.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.4–16.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.1–11.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.1–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.3–8.6
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.4–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–646.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households59.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+19.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age45.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$73,295$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$374,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 1.2778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.27 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured