Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59866

in Saint Regis, MontanaPopulation 1,161

45.91/ 100

Ranked #21,444 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #249 of 341 Montana ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #16 of 18 Missoula, MT ZIPs (bottom 11.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

86.4%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

6.6%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

87.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

36.2 mi

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.9%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

67.1%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

43.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

17.3%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Saint Regis, Montana (ZIP 59866) lands in the bottom 33% nationally (21,444th) and the bottom 27% of Montana (249th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled fine-particle sits in the top 0.6% nationally, and distance to a community health center rests in the top 2.7% nationally. Home broadband subscription is in the bottom 4.8% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the top 5.6% nationally. Fatal road crashes settles in the top 5.8% nationally, and modeled arsenic lies in the top 8.1% nationally. On the encouraging side, park land resides in the top 0.4% nationally, modeled tree cover lands in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 59842, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Missoula, MT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.0%33.0–40.6
High blood pressure among adults41.4%37.0–45.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.6%11.4–13.8
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%8.6–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.3–11.8
Depression among adults23.0%19.6–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.6–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%35.4–44.0
Obesity among adults36.0%28.5–42.9
Stroke among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.2%8.4–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.1–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.0–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.0–79.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.7–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%64.8–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.0%59.4–66.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%65.6–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.6–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.2–17.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.5%19.9–29.0
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%26.1–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%18.0–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.4–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.0–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%11.8–15.7
Any disability among adults35.1%30.0–39.9
Hearing disability among adults11.7%10.2–13.1
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.5–10.1
Mobility disability among adults17.6%14.8–20.4
Self-care disability among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%16.8–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.6–14.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.3–11.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.9–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.2
Loneliness among adults26.9%22.7–31.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6436.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)10.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription67.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate81.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households53.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+32.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age49.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$73,462$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$343,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$888$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 1.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.60 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured