Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83650

in Murphy, IdahoPopulation 464

43.21/ 100

Ranked #24,194 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #241 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 10.1%)

Ranked #33 of 38 Boise City, ID ZIPs (bottom 13.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

52.5%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

64.5%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.87 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.4%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.0%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

16.3 mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

20.9 mi

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18.5 per million

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.25%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Murphy, Idaho (ZIP 83650) lands in the bottom 25% nationally (24,194th) and the bottom 10.1% of Idaho (241st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled arsenic lands in the top 0.6% nationally, modeled mammography lies in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and walkability stands in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the top 3.3% nationally, distance to a nursing home registers in the top 4.7% nationally, and distance to an emergency room resides in the top 4.9% nationally. Slow internet speeds settles in the top 7.5% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled pfas is in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk sits in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. On the overall standing, ZIP 83624, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boise City, ID metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.9%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.3%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.2%28.6–36.0
High blood pressure among adults38.0%33.5–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.1–10.0
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.8–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%8.7–12.2
Depression among adults22.2%18.7–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%11.9–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%33.0–42.0
Obesity among adults33.4%26.0–41.5
Stroke among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.7%17.1–24.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.8%13.0–19.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.6%71.3–77.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.9%69.9–77.7
Cholesterol screening among adults79.8%77.3–82.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%55.5–66.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.9%55.1–62.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.5%55.6–73.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%10.9–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.1%14.1–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.5%25.2–35.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%29.0–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%21.3–29.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.7–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.2–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.1%16.5–21.9
Any disability among adults42.0%36.5–47.4
Hearing disability among adults12.4%11.0–14.0
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.4–12.8
Mobility disability among adults21.1%18.0–24.4
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%18.7–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.4%16.0–23.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%11.6–17.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.4–15.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.6–11.6
Loneliness among adults29.5%24.4–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.4–10.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)10.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate79.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households70.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+28.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age53.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$57,396$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$328,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.3 yr ± 2.4078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.40 years of 85.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured