Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98827

in Loomis, WashingtonPopulation 289

44.64/ 100

Ranked #22,770 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #520 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 10.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

60.3%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.2%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.5%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

43%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

16.4 per million

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

69.6 mi

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.4%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Park land

18.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Loomis, Washington (ZIP 98827) ranks in the bottom 29% nationally (22,770th) and the bottom 10.5% of Washington (520th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: housing-cost burden lies in the top 1.2% nationally, and walkability lands in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Modeled fine-particle sits in the top 3.7% nationally, and mammography is in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Homeownership settles in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and modeled hearing disability resides in the top 7.0% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled transportation noise registers at the national minimum, modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 6.6% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Close by, ZIP 98819, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%30.5–36.8
High blood pressure among adults40.0%36.5–43.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.1–10.9
Depression among adults23.0%20.1–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.6–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%35.2–42.9
Obesity among adults32.1%27.0–37.6
Stroke among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.4%13.6–19.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.8%11.0–17.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.4%73.5–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.1%69.7–76.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.3%81.1–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%61.6–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.1%51.6–58.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.5%59.0–73.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.1–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.4–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%22.1–30.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%28.8–38.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.5%21.2–27.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.4–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.2–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.6–19.0
Any disability among adults38.5%34.1–42.9
Hearing disability among adults11.4%10.1–12.7
Independent living disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.6
Mobility disability among adults19.1%16.4–21.9
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.0–6.6
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)18.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription72.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)60.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate43.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population10.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households73.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+47.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age60.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$43,309$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$1,663$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured