Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82420

in Cowley, WyomingPopulation 822

47.94/ 100

Ranked #18,997 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #113 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

53.6%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.8%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST47th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

7.7 days/year

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

9.8%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Cowley, Wyoming (ZIP 82420) places in the bottom 41% nationally (18,997th) and the bottom 27% of Wyoming (113th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and humid heat settles in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 10.8% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled colon screening resides in the bottom 3.8% nationally, mammography is in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and tree cover lands at the national minimum. Modeled fine-particle stands in the top 8.6% nationally, and unemployment registers in the top 10.1% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 82421, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%25.7–32.5
High blood pressure among adults35.3%31.3–39.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.6–10.4
Depression among adults22.3%19.0–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.3–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%31.4–39.8
Obesity among adults34.0%27.5–40.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.5%12.7–18.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.9%9.2–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%71.4–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.7%64.4–73.0
Cholesterol screening among adults82.5%79.8–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.6%48.2–59.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.9%54.2–61.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.8%57.4–73.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%11.9–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%13.6–19.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.8%23.2–32.7
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%25.5–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%17.6–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.2–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.0–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.3–17.9
Any disability among adults34.3%29.7–39.0
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.4
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.1%13.6–18.6
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–6418.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)3.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)9.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription89.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate83.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households36.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+11.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age30.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$77,679$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$232,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured