Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82421

in Deaver, WyomingPopulation 379

49.51/ 100

Ranked #16,924 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #98 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST52nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

7.5 days/year

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.7%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST26th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$42,222

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Deaver, Wyoming (ZIP 82421) lands in the bottom 47% nationally (16,924th) and the bottom 37% of Wyoming (98th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and humid heat stands in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Homeownership resides in the top 7.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled mammography registers in the bottom 4.5% nationally, tree cover sits at the national minimum, and fine-particle rests in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled colon screening is in the bottom 8.6% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 82435, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.5–32.3
High blood pressure among adults35.0%31.8–38.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.7
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.4–10.0
Depression among adults22.5%19.6–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.7–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%32.9–39.9
Obesity among adults34.3%28.9–40.3
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.9–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%9.1–13.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%72.3–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.5%66.0–73.1
Cholesterol screening among adults83.4%81.4–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.7%53.4–61.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.5%57.4–63.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.4%59.7–72.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%12.1–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%13.8–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%22.9–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%26.1–35.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%17.4–23.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%12.9–16.9
Any disability among adults32.4%28.5–36.4
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.1–17.3
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–6433.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)11.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription77.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate96.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population16.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households73.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+48.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age64.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$42,222$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.9 yr ± 1.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.05 years of 81.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured