Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82073

in Laramie, WyomingPopulation 37

60.78/ 100

Ranked #4,275 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.4%)

Ranked #10 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (top 6.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

0 days/year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

23%

in the bottom 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

13.1%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.5%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.4%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.5%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 82073, one of several in Laramie, Wyoming ranks in the top 13.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,275th) and the top 6.5% of Wyoming (10th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled humid heat stands at the national minimum, and short sleep settles in the bottom 0.05% nationally. Poverty lies at the national minimum, and homeownership resides at the national maximum. Modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 2.1% nationally, home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum, and modeled cognitive disability sits in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Against that, housing-cost burden rests at the national maximum, modeled hearing disability is in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 3.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 82063, about 24 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.05%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 1.0%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.2%30.7–39.9
High blood pressure among adults45.7%41.0–50.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults15.9%14.0–17.8
Current asthma among adults8.7%7.6–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults11.4%9.3–14.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%5.0–10.0
Depression among adults15.6%13.2–18.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%10.8–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.7%40.2–49.1
Obesity among adults26.5%21.6–32.2
Stroke among adults4.6%3.6–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%10.6–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%5.4–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%78.8–85.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.9%78.8–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults93.2%91.5–94.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.7%59.5–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.5%73.4–79.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.3%58.2–75.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.5%8.7–12.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.1%5.1–12.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.3%13.4–24.8
Short sleep duration among adults23.0%18.8–27.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.6%11.8–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults9.1%7.5–11.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%9.9–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.5%6.5–11.1
Any disability among adults29.3%23.7–36.1
Hearing disability among adults13.1%10.9–16.0
Independent living disability among adults5.7%4.2–7.8
Mobility disability among adults14.6%11.0–19.6
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.5–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.2–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–64100.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)100.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households0.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age37.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured