Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82055

in Centennial, WyomingPopulation 521

61.17/ 100

Ranked #4,029 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.6%)

Ranked #9 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

0 days/year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

24.2%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Park land

71%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

26.4 mi

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

27.1 mi

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

25.1 mi

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.9%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Centennial, Wyoming (ZIP 82055) lands in the top 12.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,029th) and the top 5.9% of Wyoming (9th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled humid heat registers at the national minimum, modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and park land settles in the top 1.1% nationally. Housing-cost burden is at the national minimum, homeownership sits at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription lands at the national maximum. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 3.0% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 1.9% nationally. On the other side, distance to a nursing home rests in the top 2.1% nationally, and distance to an emergency room registers in the top 2.5% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. On the overall standing, ZIP 82063, about 11 miles away, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.5%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.9%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 1.0%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 1.0%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.2%30.2–38.0
High blood pressure among adults42.2%37.7–46.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults15.0%13.5–16.6
Current asthma among adults9.0%7.8–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%7.8–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%5.3–9.0
Depression among adults17.1%14.4–19.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.1–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.4%39.1–47.8
Obesity among adults26.4%21.6–31.6
Stroke among adults4.1%3.4–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.6%3.6–6.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%4.7–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%77.3–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%76.9–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults91.5%89.9–92.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.3%62.0–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.2%72.1–78.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%63.9–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.7%10.5–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.6%6.2–11.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.6%13.8–22.1
Short sleep duration among adults24.2%19.7–28.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.9%11.9–18.7
Frequent mental distress among adults9.9%8.5–11.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.3–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.9%7.3–10.8
Any disability among adults27.8%23.2–32.7
Hearing disability among adults10.6%8.9–12.2
Independent living disability among adults5.7%4.6–7.0
Mobility disability among adults13.9%11.0–17.2
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.5–3.9
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.1–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)82.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+59.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age65.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$110,579$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$288,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured