Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

80013

in Aurora, ColoradoPopulation 73,248

56.86/ 100

Ranked #7,405 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #220 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #90 of 127 Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.5%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.6 mi

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

130 intersections/sq mi

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Park land

20.6%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST70th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.6%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.8%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 80013, one of several in Aurora, Colorado ranks in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,405th) and the top 44% of Colorado (220th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled high cholesterol registers in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and walkability sits in the top 6.6% nationally. Park land rests in the top 6.8% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure is in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Modeled obesity stands in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Against that, modeled disaster risk settles in the top 0.9% nationally, modeled tree cover lies at the national minimum, and PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 9.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 80014, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 40.6; chronic-disease standing 91.2 (top 10%) — 51 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,444 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.5%19.4–23.5
High blood pressure among adults27.6%25.2–30.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.5%6.0–7.1
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Depression among adults22.6%20.1–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.5%26.9–32.2
Obesity among adults27.7%24.2–31.5
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.4–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.8–14.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.1%66.0–72.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.9%65.7–71.8
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%82.1–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.6%56.8–64.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.9%59.0–64.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.5%64.4–76.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.9–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%10.9–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.0%17.4–22.7
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%30.6–37.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%15.6–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.8–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.2–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.7–16.8
Any disability among adults27.2%24.4–30.1
Hearing disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.1
Mobility disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.1–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–6412.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription97.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate74.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population18.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households46.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+12.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age36.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$101,191$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$474,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$2,201$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured