Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

79837

in Dell City, New MexicoPopulation 113

29.64/ 100

Ranked #30,841 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)

Ranked #305 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 9.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

32%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.5%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

35.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

40.5 mi

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.7%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST21st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

40.9 mi

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29.6%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.64 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

54.3%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Dell City, New Mexico (ZIP 79837) lands in the bottom 3.9% nationally (30,841st) and the bottom 9.5% of New Mexico (305th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that define the ground here come first: modeled uninsured stands in the top 0.8% nationally, and vision disability settles in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lies in the top 2.1% nationally, and distance to a nursing home resides in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled mammography lands in the bottom 1.9% nationally, distance to an emergency room registers in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled self-care disability sits in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled tooth loss rests in the top 3.4% nationally, walkability is in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 2.0% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 79847, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.07%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.07%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%28.1–31.6
High blood pressure among adults42.6%40.5–44.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%7.2–8.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.5–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%9.6–11.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.8–12.2
Depression among adults22.6%20.9–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.9%18.4–21.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%39.5–43.9
Obesity among adults40.4%36.7–44.4
Stroke among adults5.5%5.1–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.6%25.9–33.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years32.0%27.8–36.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.3%77.9–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%72.4–76.3
Cholesterol screening among adults82.6%80.9–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.5%48.1–58.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults39.9%36.6–43.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.7%55.0–71.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%12.7–15.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.8%16.8–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.3%36.9–43.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.5%31.7–44.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults35.9%32.7–39.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%17.2–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults20.1%18.5–21.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.7%18.8–22.8
Any disability among adults44.7%41.5–48.1
Hearing disability among adults11.2%10.3–12.1
Independent living disability among adults13.4%12.1–14.8
Mobility disability among adults24.8%22.6–27.2
Self-care disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.8
Vision disability among adults11.5%10.4–12.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%19.6–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.9%15.6–26.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.1%14.7–26.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%10.6–17.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.5–13.1
Loneliness among adults34.4%29.2–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.1–12.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6456.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)29.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription54.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate61.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population23.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households75.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+26.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age51.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 1.4078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.40 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured