Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

88339

in Mayhill, New MexicoPopulation 603

51.81/ 100

Ranked #13,696 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #97 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

0.7 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

23.8 mi

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST69th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

5.5 days/year

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Park land

29.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.3%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

15.1 mi

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.01%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Mayhill, New Mexico (ZIP 88339) lands in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,696th) and the top 29% of New Mexico (97th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Park land lands in the top 4.8% nationally, recreation sits in the top 4.9% nationally, and modeled binge drinking is in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 5.9% nationally. On the other side, walkability resides in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and distance to a nursing home registers in the top 5.3% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 88317, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.5%33.6–41.5
High blood pressure among adults44.8%40.2–49.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.8%11.6–14.0
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%8.5–11.9
Depression among adults24.3%20.7–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.2%13.1–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.6%39.1–48.0
Obesity among adults36.2%29.8–42.9
Stroke among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.3%10.7–16.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.7–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.5%79.5–85.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.7–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.5–91.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%62.8–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.2%63.8–70.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%64.9–78.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.3%9.2–13.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%11.5–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.1%18.2–26.9
Short sleep duration among adults31.4%26.4–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%18.8–25.3
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.2–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.2–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.2–14.9
Any disability among adults34.7%30.1–39.6
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Mobility disability among adults18.5%15.7–21.5
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.4–5.8
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%16.2–22.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.6–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.3%9.9–14.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.1–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.1
Loneliness among adults28.8%24.8–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.6–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6419.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)2.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription96.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate95.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households95.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+44.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age62.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$57,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$234,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 3.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.07 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured