Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34771

in St. Cloud, FloridaPopulation 35,257

56.69/ 100

Ranked #7,559 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #302 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #37 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

187.6 days/year

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

57.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 34771, one of several in St. Cloud, Florida ranks in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,559th) and the top 31% of Florida (302nd).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and energy burden resides in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled radon registers in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and stroke rests in the bottom 12.5% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 15% nationally. Set against that, modeled humid heat lies in the top 1.1% nationally, floodplain exposure lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled disaster risk sits in the top 3.4% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 11.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Close by, ZIP 32832, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.8%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.3 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $97,415 predicts 80.0 years — 2.6 years below.

    Ranked #3,625 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.3%19.7–25.0
High blood pressure among adults33.8%30.1–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Depression among adults18.1%15.4–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.8–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.3–42.2
Obesity among adults36.6%30.7–42.7
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.4–13.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.6%12.6–16.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.5%72.3–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.5%72.9–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.6–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.6%61.0–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.9%58.6–65.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%70.8–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%13.4–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.9%9.3–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.6%19.1–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%31.4–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%15.1–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.3–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.1–14.1
Any disability among adults26.2%22.8–29.7
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.2
Mobility disability among adults11.5%10.0–13.0
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–648.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate85.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population14.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households43.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+11.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$97,415$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$454,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,822$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured