Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78593

in Santa Rosa, TexasPopulation 5,455

38.56/ 100

Ranked #27,689 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.7%)

Ranked #1,570 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #14 of 16 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX ZIPs (bottom 12.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

39.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

51.2%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

186.4 days/year

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.5%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

20.1%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

76.7%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

12.6%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.0%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Santa Rosa, Texas (ZIP 78593), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 13.7% nationally (27,689th) and the bottom 16% of Texas (1,570th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled uninsured rests in the top 0.3% nationally, and vision disability resides in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled colon screening is in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and humid heat lands in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the top 3.0% nationally, self-care disability registers in the top 4.1% nationally, and diabetes settles in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled pfas sits in the top 2.7% nationally, crowded housing lies in the top 3.1% nationally, and unemployment rests in the top 5.3% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 78552, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Brownsville-Harlingen, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.4%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.0 ± 2.0 years. A median household income of $48,649 predicts 77.2 years — 2.8 years above.

    Ranked #513 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.3%18.1–22.6
High blood pressure among adults35.2%32.0–38.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Depression among adults19.0%16.5–21.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.1%18.0–22.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%34.0–40.5
Obesity among adults42.1%37.1–47.1
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.2%17.0–23.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years39.1%34.1–44.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%73.0–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.2%67.7–74.5
Cholesterol screening among adults81.7%79.4–83.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years51.2%46.5–55.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults43.6%40.3–46.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.5%63.8–76.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.8–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.5–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.2%35.6–44.5
Short sleep duration among adults41.1%36.6–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.5%30.8–38.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.1–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.7–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.7%17.2–22.1
Any disability among adults39.1%35.0–43.3
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Independent living disability among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
Mobility disability among adults20.7%18.3–23.1
Self-care disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.3
Vision disability among adults12.9%11.5–14.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6435.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)27.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)13.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle7.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription81.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate70.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population12.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households42.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+9.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age29.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$48,649$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$85,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$898$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.03 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured