Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78552

in Harlingen, TexasPopulation 42,332

48.42/ 100

Ranked #18,390 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #647 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #5 of 16 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

30.2%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

189.6 days/year

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

83.8%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

16.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

9.5%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.2%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

71.9 days/year

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

322 units

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST28th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 78552, one of several in Harlingen, Texas, overall, ranks in the bottom 43% nationally (18,390th) and the top 35% of Texas (647th).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled uninsured resides in the top 1.1% nationally, humid heat settles in the top 1.0% nationally, and pfas is in the top 1.2% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 2.3% nationally, crowded housing lands in the top 5.0% nationally, and modeled vision disability lies in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands in the top 5.7% nationally, and expected annual loss rests in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 8.4% nationally. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 7.6% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 78535, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Brownsville-Harlingen, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.5 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $69,811 predicts 78.7 years — 1.9 years above.

    Ranked #1,022 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.5%19.3–23.9
High blood pressure among adults34.7%31.7–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Current asthma among adults8.7%7.7–9.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–6.9
Depression among adults18.7%16.3–21.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.4%15.6–19.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%34.2–40.8
Obesity among adults38.6%34.0–43.5
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.5–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years30.2%27.2–33.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%75.0–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.4%70.3–76.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.8–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.6%53.3–61.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.0%51.8–58.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%69.1–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.2–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%10.5–13.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.2%29.6–36.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%33.9–42.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.2%24.6–29.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.6–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%14.4–17.7
Any disability among adults34.1%30.7–37.6
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.7–10.7
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.6–19.3
Self-care disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.0
Vision disability among adults9.2%8.4–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6428.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)18.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate75.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population15.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households49.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+14.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age33.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$69,811$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$169,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,113$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured