Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78521

in Brownsville, TexasPopulation 87,380

36.21/ 100

Ranked #28,904 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.9%)

Ranked #1,688 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 9.7%)

Ranked #15 of 16 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX ZIPs (bottom 6.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

41.6%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

14.3%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

47.5%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.9%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

189.6 days/year

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,017 units

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

20.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

ZIP 78521, one of several in Brownsville, Texas, overall, ranks in the bottom 9.9% nationally (28,904th) and the bottom 9.7% of Texas (1,688th).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled uninsured is in the top 0.2% nationally, vision disability sits in the top 0.7% nationally, and colon screening lands in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lies in the top 1.6% nationally, self-care disability stands in the top 2.5% nationally, and humid heat rests in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 1.1% nationally, and diabetes resides in the top 2.8% nationally. PFOA in drinking water settles at the national maximum. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing is in the top 1.4% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 78520, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Brownsville-Harlingen, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.2 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $44,509 predicts 76.9 years — 2.3 years above.

    Ranked #781 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.7%18.6–23.0
High blood pressure among adults35.3%32.3–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.5–8.0
Depression among adults19.8%17.3–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.7%18.7–22.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%34.1–40.6
Obesity among adults42.8%38.0–47.8
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.4%18.2–24.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years41.6%38.5–44.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.6%73.0–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.0%67.7–74.1
Cholesterol screening among adults80.5%78.5–82.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years47.5%43.0–51.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults41.4%38.4–44.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.2%62.2–75.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.5–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%13.5–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.3%38.4–46.2
Short sleep duration among adults41.4%36.9–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.9%33.9–40.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.1–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults18.6%16.7–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.2%19.2–23.3
Any disability among adults41.2%37.6–44.9
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Independent living disability among adults13.5%12.2–14.7
Mobility disability among adults22.1%20.0–24.2
Self-care disability among adults8.2%7.6–8.8
Vision disability among adults14.3%13.2–15.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6444.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)36.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle6.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription82.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate60.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)13.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population30.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households38.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+14.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age31.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$44,509$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$99,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$889$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 0.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.45 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured