Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78371

in Oilton, TexasPopulation 101

39.95/ 100

Ranked #26,791 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #1,461 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #5 of 10 Laredo, TX ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

36.5%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.0%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

115.4 days/year

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.3%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

163.6 days/year

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.2%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

15.0%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Oilton, Texas (ZIP 78371) places in the bottom 16% nationally (26,791st) and the bottom 22% of Texas (1,461st).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled uninsured registers in the top 0.4% nationally, and vision disability settles in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits in the top 0.9% nationally, and fair or poor health lies in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the top 2.6% nationally, colon screening resides in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and mammography is in the bottom 4.2% nationally. Unemployment lands in the top 3.8% nationally. On the stronger side, housing-cost burden stands at the national minimum, and homeownership registers at the national maximum.

For readers new to these terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 78369, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Laredo, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.0%19.1–25.2
High blood pressure among adults35.2%31.1–39.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.0–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.2–7.3
Depression among adults19.6%16.5–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.6%16.0–21.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%32.5–41.4
Obesity among adults44.1%35.7–53.2
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.7%15.3–22.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years36.5%30.1–43.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.3%72.2–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.6%68.2–76.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%79.8–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.4%48.5–60.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.1%40.3–47.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.2%56.9–74.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%11.8–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%11.8–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.7%36.1–49.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.5%32.7–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.3%29.3–39.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.2–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%15.5–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%16.4–22.2
Any disability among adults41.0%35.2–46.5
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.2–12.6
Mobility disability among adults21.2%18.0–24.4
Self-care disability among adults6.6%5.5–7.7
Vision disability among adults11.0%9.5–12.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6415.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)36.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)2.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)15.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population23.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households33.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+40.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age61.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured