Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78140

in Nixon, TexasPopulation 3,474

42.48/ 100

Ranked #24,840 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #1,252 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

28.4%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

91.9 days/year

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

153 days/year

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.4%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST22nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.1%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.4%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

11 mi

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.5%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Nixon, Texas (ZIP 78140) ranks in the bottom 23% nationally (24,840th) and the bottom 33% of Texas (1,252nd).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled uninsured sits in the top 1.5% nationally, and extreme heat is in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 3.9% nationally, and colon screening resides in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 7.8% nationally, modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 9.6% nationally, and distance to a nursing home stands in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability lies in the top 9.6% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 12.7% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled radon sits in the bottom 7.3% nationally.

To spell things out, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 78116, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.7%22.1–27.6
High blood pressure among adults37.1%33.4–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.8–6.9
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Depression among adults21.3%18.3–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.0%14.1–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.1–42.1
Obesity among adults40.0%32.3–48.2
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.5–17.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years28.4%24.4–32.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%73.3–78.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.1%69.3–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.0–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.4%51.6–61.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.2%44.7–51.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.1%60.2–75.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.3–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.4–17.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.6%31.5–41.7
Short sleep duration among adults38.5%32.1–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.4%26.1–32.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.0–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%16.1–20.2
Any disability among adults38.4%34.0–42.7
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Independent living disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.6–21.1
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.1
Vision disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6422.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)23.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle10.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription86.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate73.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population16.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households37.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$50,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$85,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$845$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured