Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78263

in China Grove, TexasPopulation 4,253

49.14/ 100

Ranked #17,461 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #600 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #59 of 117 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX ZIPs (bottom 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

96 days/year

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

152.3 days/year

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

China Grove, Texas (ZIP 78263) ranks in the bottom 46% nationally (17,461st) and the top 32% of Texas (600th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled radon is in the bottom 8.0% nationally, and recreation registers in the top 13.8% nationally. Dental providers lies in the top 18% nationally. Working the other way, modeled extreme heat is in the top 1.7% nationally, humid heat registers in the top 4.1% nationally, and uninsured lies in the top 7.9% nationally. Home broadband subscription is in the bottom 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure lies in the top 16% nationally, and slow internet speeds is in the top 20% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 78101, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.5–32.0
High blood pressure among adults39.3%36.1–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.2–8.2
Depression among adults23.2%20.4–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.6–17.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%34.6–41.4
Obesity among adults33.2%28.9–37.6
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.4–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.8%14.3–19.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.5%75.7–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%72.6–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.5–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%62.0–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.0%56.2–61.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%68.0–79.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.9–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.3–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.6%26.1–33.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%35.7–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%19.8–25.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.3–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.5–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%12.9–16.6
Any disability among adults33.4%29.8–37.3
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Mobility disability among adults16.9%14.8–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–5.0
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6414.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)14.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription79.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate75.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population11.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households63.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+24.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age51.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$80,156$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$331,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,370$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 1.2978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.29 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured