Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78108

in Cibolo, TexasPopulation 49,784

56.39/ 100

Ranked #7,876 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #240 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 12.9%)

Ranked #27 of 117 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

89.5 days/year

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

148.9 days/year

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.3%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.9%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.6%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Cibolo, Texas (ZIP 78108) lands in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,876th) and the top 12.9% of Texas (240th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, this area's strong points come through first: modeled coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 4.6% nationally, fatal road crashes lands in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Modeled energy burden stands in the bottom 5.9% nationally, stroke rests in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and radon registers in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Set against that, modeled extreme heat resides in the top 3.2% nationally, and humid heat settles in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss is in the top 8.7% nationally, and binge drinking sits in the top 8.8% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. On the overall standing, ZIP 78132, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.1 ± 1.8 years. The 43 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.0 years — 3.2 years above them.

    Ranked #730 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.8%19.4–24.4
High blood pressure among adults31.3%28.0–34.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.2–6.3
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Depression among adults22.3%19.4–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.7–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%29.5–36.7
Obesity among adults34.1%28.8–39.8
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.4–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.4%11.9–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.7%70.6–76.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.8–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.5–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.3%54.6–64.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.1%56.7–63.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%68.1–81.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%16.4–22.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.7%10.2–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%19.2–25.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%33.4–44.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%15.4–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.9–14.7
Any disability among adults26.9%23.6–30.2
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Independent living disability among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Mobility disability among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
Vision disability among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–648.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate83.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population7.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households40.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+11.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age35.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$113,004$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$337,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$2,171$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured