Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32095

in Saint Augustine, FloridaPopulation 21,399

60.43/ 100

Ranked #4,530 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.2%)

Ranked #176 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #11 of 60 Jacksonville, FL ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

62.5%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

159.5 days/year

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$136,038

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.7 µg/L

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

65.3%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Park land

20.3%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.5%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 32095, one of several in Saint Augustine, Florida stands in the top 14.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,530th) and the top 18% of Florida (176th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and household income rests in the top 5.8% nationally. Lithium in drinking water lands in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and recreation settles in the top 5.3% nationally. Park land rests in the top 6.9% nationally, modeled energy burden lands in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the top 11.3% nationally. Working the other way, floodplain exposure rests in the top 2.3% nationally, modeled humid heat lands in the top 2.8% nationally, and modeled pfas settles in the top 5.9% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 32081, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.9%23.0–29.1
High blood pressure among adults33.7%30.2–37.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.7–10.4
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.4–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.1–7.3
Depression among adults18.1%15.4–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.0–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%33.7–41.1
Obesity among adults30.4%25.2–36.2
Stroke among adults3.0%2.6–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.6–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.5–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%73.7–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.6–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%86.9–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.1%67.0–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%60.2–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%71.6–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.0–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%9.0–13.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.5%15.1–22.2
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%28.4–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.1%12.7–17.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.2–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%10.8–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%9.8–13.2
Any disability among adults24.5%20.9–28.3
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–7.1
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.4–7.4
Mobility disability among adults11.5%9.6–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–646.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)56.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription96.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate92.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population15.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households54.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age42.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$136,038$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$525,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,676$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 1.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured