Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76692

in Whitney, TexasPopulation 9,853

41.83/ 100

Ranked #25,367 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #1,312 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

94.2 days/year

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

71 µg/L

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

18.2 mi

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

31.2%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.1%

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US74th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Whitney, Texas (ZIP 76692), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 21% nationally (25,367th) and the bottom 30% of Texas (1,312th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled extreme heat sits in the top 1.9% nationally, lithium in drinking water settles in the top 5.7% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 6.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands in the top 6.9% nationally, floodplain exposure lands in the top 9.5% nationally, and modeled humid heat is in the top 11.3% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled radon resides in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and lead in tap water rests in the bottom 12.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 12.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 76627, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.3 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $55,149 predicts 77.7 years — 3.4 years below.

    Ranked #4,590 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.3 ± 1.7 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.1 years — 3.7 years below them.

    Ranked #2,879 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 21.2 — 74 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #796 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.0%29.4–36.8
High blood pressure among adults42.6%38.1–47.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–11.8
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Depression among adults23.9%20.3–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.3–17.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.1%37.3–46.7
Obesity among adults36.2%28.0–44.7
Stroke among adults4.8%4.3–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.3%13.6–19.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.5–15.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.4–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.0–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.1–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%59.5–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.1%49.4–57.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.9%62.4–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.3–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%13.8–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.3%25.6–35.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%32.5–46.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.2%21.2–27.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.3–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.8–17.5
Any disability among adults37.4%32.7–42.1
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.8–11.1
Mobility disability among adults19.5%17.1–22.0
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.5
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6426.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)12.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription88.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate81.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households62.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+29.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age50.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$55,149$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$169,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$877$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured