ZIP code
76828
in Burkett, TexasPopulation 168
42.45/ 100
Ranked #24,865 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)
Ranked #1,255 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 33%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
5.0%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
40.5%
in the top 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
101.1 mi
in the top 3.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
84.1 days/year
in the top 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST55thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›Lithium in drinking water
9.6 µg/L
in the bottom 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS4thDefinition & source ›
The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.
Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.02%
in the bottom 6.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
96.9%
in the top 6.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
43.1%
in the top 10.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 16% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS16thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Burkett, Texas (ZIP 76828) lands in the bottom 22% nationally (24,865th) and the bottom 33% of Texas (1,255th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: slow internet speeds lies in the top 2.5% nationally, and poverty lands in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits in the top 4.4% nationally. On the better side, housing-cost burden is at the national minimum, distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 3.6% nationally, and lithium in drinking water resides in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and homeownership rests in the top 6.5% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.
Set beside the nearby areas, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 76443, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 99%
14%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 42%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 43%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 15%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 36%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 35%
8%
Disability
healthier than 23%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 2%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 26%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.9%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 82%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 61%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 5%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 37%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 27%
8%
Disability
healthier than 27%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 8%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 27%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
76443
Texasshares a border
Score 44.91
Closest healthier
76801
Texasshares a border
Score 42.69
Similar health profile
75926
Texas99% similar profile
Score 42.95
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.1% | 30.9–39.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 43.3% | 38.2–48.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.2% | 9.9–12.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.3% | 9.9–12.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.0% | 7.6–10.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.7% | 8.5–12.8 |
| Depression among adults | 24.6% | 20.6–29.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.8% | 13.3–18.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.1% | 37.8–48.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 37.0% | 28.0–46.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.9% | 4.1–5.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 16.9% | 13.9–20.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.4% | 9.7–15.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.1% | 78.9–84.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.9% | 74.9–82.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.7% | 86.7–90.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.6% | 57.3–67.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 55.0% | 51.2–58.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.5% | 67.2–75.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.2% | 11.3–17.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 16.3% | 12.9–19.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 30.0% | 24.2–36.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.1% | 30.2–44.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.5% | 20.2–28.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.4% | 15.0–19.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.1% | 14.5–19.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.8% | 13.4–18.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 37.7% | 32.1–43.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.6% | 8.2–11.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.3% | 8.6–12.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 20.6% | 17.1–24.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.2% | 4.2–6.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.4% | 5.3–7.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | TX median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 40.5% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 12.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 22.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 1.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 23.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868 |
| Broadband subscription | 87.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 26.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868 |
| Homeownership rate | 96.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 75.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 8.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861 |
| Population 65+ | 48.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 16.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886 |
| Median age | 65.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 38.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866 |
| Median household income | $49,141 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | TX median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.8 yr ± 1.24 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured