Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76049

in Granbury, TexasPopulation 31,506

55.29/ 100

Ranked #9,107 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #275 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 14.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

89.4 days/year

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

22.8 mi

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

11.8%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

32.9%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 76049, one of several in Granbury, Texas, on the composite measure, lands in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,107th) and the top 14.8% of Texas (275th).

continue reading

Reading across the measures, this area's clearest strengths come through: modeled radon rests in the bottom 6.5% nationally, home broadband subscription sits in the top 14.2% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability registers in the bottom 16% nationally. By contrast, modeled extreme heat lands in the top 3.2% nationally, modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 3.4% nationally, and distance to a community health center lies in the top 6.7% nationally. Modeled disaster risk settles in the top 8.9% nationally, and humid heat stands in the top 13.0% nationally. Lithium in drinking water is in the top 14.1% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 76008, about 2.5 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%27.0–33.7
High blood pressure among adults38.6%34.5–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.3–12.3
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.7–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Depression among adults22.1%19.0–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.7–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%37.2–46.0
Obesity among adults32.3%25.2–40.0
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.4–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.9–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.4–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.9–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.9–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%62.8–71.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.6%60.3–66.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%67.8–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.2–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.9%9.3–12.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.7%19.1–26.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%28.1–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.0%14.9–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%13.0–16.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.3–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Any disability among adults30.0%26.2–34.1
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Mobility disability among adults14.1%12.3–16.1
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6417.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription96.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate87.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population5.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households68.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+29.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age51.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$104,967$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$363,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,559$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured