Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75852

in Midway, TexasPopulation 3,323

40.60/ 100

Ranked #26,329 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #1,410 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

27.9%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

52.7%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.5%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

28.9%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.1%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

72.7 days/year

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.1%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

144.7 days/year

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.6%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Midway, Texas (ZIP 75852) stands in the bottom 18% nationally (26,329th) and the bottom 25% of Texas (1,410th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: modeled uninsured settles in the top 1.5% nationally, and colon screening rests in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lands in the top 2.4% nationally, and short sleep settles in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests in the top 5.7% nationally, tooth loss lands in the top 7.2% nationally, and humid heat settles in the top 6.2% nationally. Walkability rests in the bottom 8.2% nationally. More positively, modeled high cholesterol lands in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 6.3% nationally.

For clarity, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 75833, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.5%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 1.0%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults15.7%13.8–17.9
High blood pressure among adults32.0%28.0–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Current asthma among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.0–6.6
Depression among adults19.5%16.4–22.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.8–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened28.9%25.2–32.8
Obesity among adults39.4%31.1–48.4
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.1%21.4–29.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years27.9%22.8–33.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure60.3%56.9–63.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults65.8%61.0–70.3
Cholesterol screening among adults74.0%70.1–77.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years52.7%47.9–57.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults39.6%36.3–43.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.6%60.1–76.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.5%17.9–25.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.4%15.1–21.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.4%25.8–36.8
Short sleep duration among adults44.1%36.9–51.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.1%21.9–30.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.4–22.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.4–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.9%16.7–22.8
Any disability among adults35.4%30.0–40.7
Hearing disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.1–11.0
Mobility disability among adults12.1%10.4–13.9
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.7%5.7–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6425.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)24.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)8.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription74.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate88.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population7.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+8.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age37.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$72,847$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$214,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,151$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured