Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77318

in Willis, TexasPopulation 20,792

52.52/ 100

Ranked #12,734 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #387 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #82 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

155.7 days/year

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

54.4 days/year

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

30.4%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

31.2%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 77318, one of several in Willis, Texas ranks in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,734th) and the top 21% of Texas (387th).

continue reading

A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled radon rests in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and arsenic stands in the bottom 12.7% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 14.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat lands in the top 3.2% nationally, air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 4.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden is in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles in the top 8.2% nationally, floodplain exposure resides in the top 9.9% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 10.5% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Close by, ZIP 77304, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.4 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $92,415 predicts 79.8 years — 2.4 years below.

    Ranked #3,232 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 77.4 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.2%25.0–31.4
High blood pressure among adults36.0%32.0–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Depression among adults22.2%18.9–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.9–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%36.0–44.4
Obesity among adults31.2%24.9–37.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.5–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.4%10.7–14.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%75.9–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.3–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.6–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.3%62.1–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.8%56.6–62.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%69.7–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.3–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%11.0–14.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%20.0–27.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%32.6–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.4–21.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.3–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.8–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.9–15.0
Any disability among adults29.6%25.8–33.5
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Mobility disability among adults14.3%12.5–16.2
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6416.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)9.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate80.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population7.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households61.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+19.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age43.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$92,415$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$316,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,386$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured