Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75554

in Avery, TexasPopulation 1,883

41.06/ 100

Ranked #25,980 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #1,365 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

1.6 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.7%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

15.5 mi

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

53.8 days/year

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Avery, Texas (ZIP 75554) places in the bottom 19% nationally (25,980th) and the bottom 27% of Texas (1,365th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled pfas registers in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled radon sits in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, walkability lies in the bottom 5.3% nationally, modeled extreme heat rests in the top 8.3% nationally, and modeled disaster risk resides in the top 9.0% nationally. Slow internet speeds is in the top 11.1% nationally, modeled humid heat lands in the top 11.5% nationally, and distance to a nursing home stands in the top 14.9% nationally. Household income registers in the bottom 10.7% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 75559, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.4–35.9
High blood pressure among adults42.9%39.1–46.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.7–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.5–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%9.3–11.7
Depression among adults24.5%21.4–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.5%13.7–17.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.5%37.5–45.5
Obesity among adults36.5%29.5–44.3
Stroke among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%12.8–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.9%11.2–14.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.6–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.1%74.0–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.9–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%56.8–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.7%48.9–56.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%64.4–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.9–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%15.1–19.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.3%26.2–34.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%31.6–45.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.8%22.2–27.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%16.4–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.8–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.8–18.2
Any disability among adults37.9%33.9–42.2
Hearing disability among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.6
Mobility disability among adults19.7%17.5–22.1
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6430.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)8.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription80.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate85.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households56.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+24.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age48.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$46,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$166,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$738$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 1.3078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.30 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured