Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74740

in Haworth, OklahomaPopulation 1,959

33.88/ 100

Ranked #29,777 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.2%)

Ranked #510 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

66.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.5%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.4%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

70.9%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

35%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.4%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST58th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

27.2%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.1%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Haworth, Oklahoma (ZIP 74740) ranks in the bottom 7.2% nationally (29,777th) and the bottom 20% of Oklahoma (510th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and pfas is in the bottom 9.3% nationally. On the other side, fatal road crashes settles in the top 1.6% nationally, and unemployment resides in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the top 6.0% nationally, modeled hearing disability rests in the top 5.6% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Floodplain exposure lies in the top 7.9% nationally, modeled mammography lands in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and poverty sits in the top 8.7% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 71832, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 65.4; chronic-disease standing 7.2 (bottom 10%) — 58 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,875 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.0%31.3–38.8
High blood pressure among adults46.4%41.9–50.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Current asthma among adults12.4%11.0–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%8.9–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.6%10.0–13.2
Depression among adults25.0%21.3–28.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.0%14.8–19.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.4%37.9–47.1
Obesity among adults43.0%34.9–51.4
Stroke among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.7%19.1–27.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.1–13.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.5–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%76.8–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.7–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.6%53.4–64.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.4%46.6–54.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.4%59.7–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.3%9.9–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.0%17.9–24.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.8%31.3–42.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%32.0–45.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.6%23.1–30.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.1–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.3–19.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.6–21.2
Any disability among adults44.2%39.1–49.2
Hearing disability among adults11.7%10.3–13.0
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.5–13.4
Mobility disability among adults23.4%20.3–26.3
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.5%21.6–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.9%18.8–25.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.6%17.5–24.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.3–18.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
Loneliness among adults32.8%27.6–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.7–14.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6430.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)16.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)13.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription70.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate73.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population1.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households62.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+25.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age44.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$41,141$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$99,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$567$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 1.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.55 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured