Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74937

in Heavener, OklahomaPopulation 5,220

31.63/ 100

Ranked #30,402 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.2%)

Ranked #558 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 12.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

61.6%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.3%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.8%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.5%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.4%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

71.5%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.7%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.8%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

70.8%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Heavener, Oklahoma (ZIP 74937) stands in the bottom 5.2% nationally (30,402nd) and the bottom 12.0% of Oklahoma (558th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled tree cover lies in the top 8.8% nationally. Working the other way, modeled mammography is in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and colon screening registers in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lies in the top 5.3% nationally, mobility disability is in the top 7.3% nationally, and tooth loss registers in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lies in the top 7.0% nationally, home broadband subscription is in the bottom 7.1% nationally, and modeled independent living disability registers in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled vision disability lies in the top 8.3% nationally.

ZIP 71953, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby. Modeled mobility disability lies in the top 7.3% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.8–34.4
High blood pressure among adults42.2%37.9–46.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Current asthma among adults12.4%10.9–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Depression among adults25.8%22.0–29.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.9%13.9–17.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.8%36.4–45.1
Obesity among adults41.0%33.5–48.4
Stroke among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.5%20.8–28.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.3%14.1–18.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.7–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.3–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults82.0%79.9–84.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.4%49.2–59.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.9%43.3–50.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years61.6%52.7–69.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%10.5–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.4%19.6–25.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.3%35.1–45.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%32.7–44.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.6%25.3–31.7
Frequent mental distress among adults20.1%17.8–22.4
Frequent physical distress among adults18.3%16.2–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.3%19.1–23.5
Any disability among adults45.8%40.9–50.4
Hearing disability among adults11.4%10.3–12.6
Independent living disability among adults12.7%11.4–14.1
Mobility disability among adults22.8%20.3–25.2
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Vision disability among adults8.8%8.0–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.6%23.7–31.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.3%22.8–29.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.4%20.3–26.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.3%15.9–21.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.6–14.8
Loneliness among adults34.8%29.5–40.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.8%12.1–15.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6435.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)21.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle10.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription71.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate70.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population9.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households47.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$41,367$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$104,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$764$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.2 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 75.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured