Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74462

in Stigler, OklahomaPopulation 7,114

36.25/ 100

Ranked #28,880 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.0%)

Ranked #452 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

65.4%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST22nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.1%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.54 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.5%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Stigler, Oklahoma (ZIP 74462) sits in the bottom 10.0% nationally (28,880th) and the bottom 29% of Oklahoma (452nd).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Childcare lies in the top 9.1% nationally, and modeled binge drinking settles in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled mammography is in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and hearing disability rests in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability sits in the top 9.3% nationally, and extreme heat registers in the top 11.0% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lands in the top 11.9% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the top 11.5% nationally.

In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. ZIP 74472, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%30.7–37.4
High blood pressure among adults45.1%40.9–49.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.9–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.1%9.9–12.2
Depression among adults25.3%21.9–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%13.7–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.3%38.1–46.5
Obesity among adults41.8%34.1–49.6
Stroke among adults5.0%4.6–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.4%18.9–26.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.6–13.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%77.1–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.6–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.3–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.9%54.8–64.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.7%47.8–55.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.4%56.6–73.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.2–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.2%17.8–22.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.7%30.8–40.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%33.4–46.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%22.6–28.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.4–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%15.4–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.9–20.7
Any disability among adults44.0%39.5–48.5
Hearing disability among adults12.2%11.0–13.4
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.3–12.6
Mobility disability among adults22.1%19.6–24.5
Self-care disability among adults5.4%5.0–6.0
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%22.0–29.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.1%17.5–22.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.2–20.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.3–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.3–11.7
Loneliness among adults31.9%27.1–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6425.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)15.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle6.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription80.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate76.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households52.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+22.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age44.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$49,293$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$167,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$792$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured