ZIP code
74436
in Haskell, OklahomaPopulation 5,057
41.23/ 100
Ranked #25,850 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)
Ranked #262 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 41%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Fatal road crashes
41.5 per 100,000 residents per year
in the top 6.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.
A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
48.8 days/year
in the top 9.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST22ndUS90thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›PFOS in drinking water
57.5%
in the top 16% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS84thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.
Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.
Full methodology ›The read
Haskell, Oklahoma (ZIP 74436), overall, ranks in the bottom 19% nationally (25,850th) and the top 41% of Oklahoma (262nd).
This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home rests at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, fatal road crashes registers in the top 6.3% nationally, and modeled extreme heat resides in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the bottom 12.0% nationally, and fine-particle is in the top 14.9% nationally. Modeled hearing disability sits in the top 14.4% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water lands in the top 16% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lies in the top 17% nationally. Recreation stands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.
Defined simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 74008, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Healthcare Access
healthier than 63%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 41%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 22%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 35%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 28%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 25%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 22%
8%
Disability
healthier than 20%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 16%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 68%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 68%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 70%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 53%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 44%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 46%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 44%
8%
Disability
healthier than 53%
7%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 39%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
74008
Oklahomashares a border
Score 55.68
Closest healthier
74014
Oklahomashares a border
Score 50.95
Similar health profile
72476
Arkansas99% similar profile
Score 36.08
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.3% | 29.6–35.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.7% | 39.4–46.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.0% | 8.4–9.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.3% | 11.1–13.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.4% | 7.6–9.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.5% | 8.5–10.5 |
| Depression among adults | 25.6% | 22.8–28.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.3% | 12.8–15.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.1% | 36.9–43.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.3% | 34.1–44.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.4% | 4.1–4.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.1% | 15.5–21.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.8% | 8.5–11.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.5% | 76.2–80.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.7% | 77.0–82.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.0% | 84.4–87.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 61.2% | 57.1–64.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 55.9% | 52.8–58.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 69.5% | 63.0–75.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.5% | 11.7–15.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.4% | 16.2–20.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.8% | 28.9–36.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.1% | 34.4–43.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.2% | 20.7–25.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.5% | 16.7–20.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.1% | 14.5–17.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.0% | 16.3–19.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.5% | 38.7–46.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.4% | 9.4–11.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.4% | 9.4–11.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 20.1% | 18.0–22.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.8% | 4.4–5.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.5% | 5.9–7.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.4% | 22.3–28.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.8% | 15.5–20.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 15.3% | 13.2–17.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.4% | 11.8–15.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.6% | 8.6–10.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.0% | 29.1–37.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 10.3% | 9.1–11.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 13.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 28.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 12.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 14.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 86.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 85.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 2.6% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 56.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 20.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 42.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $62,723 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | $149,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $850 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured