Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

73729

in Cleo Springs, OklahomaPopulation 645

41.54/ 100

Ranked #25,630 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #255 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

54.7%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

80.3 mi

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

72.8 days/year

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

19.8 mi

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Cleo Springs, Oklahoma (ZIP 73729), overall, ranks in the bottom 20% nationally (25,630th) and the top 40% of Oklahoma (255th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: distance to a Superfund site is in the top 5.1% nationally. Unemployment sits at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 9.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled nitrate lies in the top 0.8% nationally, and extreme heat stands in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the top 6.5% nationally, and distance to a community health center registers in the top 8.4% nationally. Slow internet speeds resides in the top 10.7% nationally, and modeled mammography settles in the bottom 13.2% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol is in the top 11.6% nationally.

Defined simply, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 73737, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.4%31.7–38.9
High blood pressure among adults43.3%38.9–47.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.9–12.1
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.2–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.7–11.8
Depression among adults24.7%21.2–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.1%12.2–16.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.8%38.4–47.1
Obesity among adults41.5%33.7–49.5
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.3%11.0–16.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%7.9–11.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.8–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%76.9–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.5–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%61.1–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.1%52.3–60.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.8%61.5–77.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.4%10.2–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%14.4–20.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.5%29.5–39.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%27.5–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%18.7–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.7–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.9–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.5%14.3–18.6
Any disability among adults40.3%35.5–45.1
Hearing disability among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.7–11.4
Mobility disability among adults20.3%17.5–23.1
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.3–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.1–17.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.3–15.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.9–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.6
Loneliness among adults31.3%26.4–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6422.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)1.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription85.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate82.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households65.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+26.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age44.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$66,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$99,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$693$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 1.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.55 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured